From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32672: 27.0.50; image resize on window resizing Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:35:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83in2vb8dw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pnxmyjgt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ftyfoakb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5B98B33D.7000605@gmx.at> <871s9ycnjl.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5B9A15DA.5000403@gmx.at> <87efdxnfww.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5B9B7253.5060808@gmx.at> <87pnxexr2m.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5B9E1E0E.7070805@gmx.at> <87h8ip2eby.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5B9F4DBD.5020009@gmx.at> <877ejjzr9s.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BA20763.8070305@gmx.at> <875zz1t6y1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BA34D7E.4030509@gmx.at> <87fty3sp6a.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BA490E5.5090506@gmx.at> <87zhw9xjpx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BA74E3D.5030903@gmx.at> <87va6wt79n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BA89ED5.4050207@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537778046 1052 195.159.176.226 (24 Sep 2018 08:34:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 32672@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 24 10:34:01 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g4MJd-00008V-El for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:34:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44069 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4MLj-0006Bs-VP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:36:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34274) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4MLd-0006Bj-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:36:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4MLa-00043J-2u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4MLZ-00043E-Sn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g4MLZ-0001vh-Pf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32672 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32672-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32672.15377781407389 (code B ref 32672); Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32672) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2018 08:35:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g4MLE-0001v7-IA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:35:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52831) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g4MLC-0001us-Iq for 32672@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:35:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4ML3-0003jI-Vt for 32672@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:35:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4ML3-0003j0-S3; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:35:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1597 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1g4ML3-0006VG-FA; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:35:29 -0400 In-reply-to: <5BA89ED5.4050207@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:22:45 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:150589 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:22:45 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > Cc: 32672@debbugs.gnu.org > > I don't know what to do. We run hooks too often and do not provide > sufficient information when running them. Sometimes we even hide > information when running a hook. The problem is that changing the > current situation will have us either run even more hooks or cause > protests when a hook is no more run where it was run before. I agree. I think Lisp programs that use hooks provided by display-related code should generally expect to be called in many unrelated situations, and do whatever it takes by themselves to detect when it's "their" use case. Expectations or requests for more focused hooks are impractical or even not feasible to implement, because core code knows very little about the Lisp application which uses the hook.