From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33602: 27.0.50; Compiling no file at Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2018 22:36:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83in034uxp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5C0A7B00.5030106@gmx.at> <20181207145947.GB7949@ACM> <5C0AB2C2.8030600@gmx.at> <20181207181112.GE7949@ACM> <83efat5eox.fsf@gnu.org> <20181207192706.GH7949@ACM> <83d0qd5d2n.fsf@gnu.org> <20181207200659.GI7949@ACM> <83va4447mb.fsf@gnu.org> <20181208200705.GB17410@ACM> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1544301367 28721 195.159.176.226 (8 Dec 2018 20:36:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 20:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: markusffm@fn.de, 33602@debbugs.gnu.org, m43cap@yandex.com To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 08 21:36:03 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gVjKU-0007MP-Tl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 21:36:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52026 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVjMb-0007kM-74 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 15:38:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVjMU-0007ZT-PA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 15:38:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVjMQ-00015M-Hp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 15:38:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVjMQ-00014i-Df for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 15:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gVjMQ-0004B7-6E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 15:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2018 20:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33602 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33602-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33602.154430145515961 (code B ref 33602); Sat, 08 Dec 2018 20:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33602) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2018 20:37:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38799 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gVjLz-00049N-Fj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 15:37:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38775) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gVjLx-00049B-TX for 33602@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 15:37:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVjLr-0000pc-Pn for 33602@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 15:37:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVjLj-0000nP-Ns; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 15:37:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3173 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gVjLh-0004uc-CP; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 15:37:19 -0500 In-reply-to: <20181208200705.GB17410@ACM> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Sat, 8 Dec 2018 20:07:05 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:153227 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 20:07:05 +0000 > Cc: rgm@gnu.org, markusffm@fn.de, 33602@debbugs.gnu.org, m43cap@yandex.com > From: Alan Mackenzie > > > If we want to change the text, it's fine. But removing the log > > altogether sounds like too much to me. > > Why? The log doesn't appear in Emacs-26. It does appear in recent > versions of master. The creation of this buffer is an unintended > consequence of the amendments I made to the byte compiler's warning > message mechanism around a week and a half ago. > > In a call of byte-compile, both byte-compile-current-file and > byte-compile-last-logged-file tend to be nil. > > Whereas the condition at the top of byte-compile-log-file used to be > > (not (equal byte-compile-current-file byte-compile-last-logged-file)) > > , now it additionally checks > > (get-buffer byte-compile-log-buffer) > > , and "re"creates that buffer if it doesn't exist. > > So previously, *Compile-Log* didn't get created. Now it does. I think > I should revert that part of the change. What do you say? No objections here. > Changing the wording is a separate issue, but I think it should also be > done. I would suggest instead of "Compiling no file at