From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35164: 25.1; `re-search-forward' docstring args Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 17:33:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83imvr9p9v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <861s2gffd3.fsf@zoho.eu> <83ef6fbqsz.fsf@gnu.org> <86r2afbof1.fsf@zoho.eu> <83sguva4qo.fsf@gnu.org> <86ef6fb3z5.fsf@zoho.eu> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="25352"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35164@debbugs.gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 06 16:35:26 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hCmPk-0006Jr-LM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 16:35:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55567 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCmPe-0007Te-7l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:35:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCmPP-0007TK-FS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:35:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCmPO-0004dK-Lb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCmPO-0004cp-EV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hCmPO-0003nP-90 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 14:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35164 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35164-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35164.155456124614514 (code B ref 35164); Sat, 06 Apr 2019 14:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35164) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2019 14:34:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hCmOU-0003m2-72 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33880) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hCmOT-0003lW-Bj for 35164@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCmON-00046Q-6o; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:34:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2807 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hCmOM-0008Rl-Me; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:33:59 -0400 In-reply-to: <86ef6fb3z5.fsf@zoho.eu> (message from Emanuel Berg on Sat, 06 Apr 2019 16:30:54 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157269 Archived-At: > From: Emanuel Berg > Cc: 35164@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 16:30:54 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I don't think I understand how this answers > > my question. Please humor me and provide > > a direct answer. > > I'm dropping this issue 100%. I thought it > would be a quick fix, but if you want > docstrings that do not conform with your own > rules do it. Which rules, please? I really don't think I understand that, and I don't think I asked something that should trigger such a reaction. I mean, if you submit a bug report, and I ask for clarifying it, why would you refuse?