From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35624: log-view-diff regression Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 09:01:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83imuliiwd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pnou2ak2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="12398"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35624@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 08 08:03:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOFfd-00037i-FD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 08:03:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59902 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOFfc-0003ZO-FH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 02:03:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOFfT-0003Yp-E2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 02:03:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOFfS-0004vQ-HY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 02:03:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOFfS-0004vM-Dh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 02:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hOFfS-0003YB-9p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 02:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 06:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35624 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35624-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35624.155729533713573 (code B ref 35624); Wed, 08 May 2019 06:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35624) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2019 06:02:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60169 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hOFei-0003Wr-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 02:02:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51471) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hOFeh-0003We-RM for 35624@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 02:02:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOFec-0004eh-MN; Wed, 08 May 2019 02:02:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1988 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hOFeX-0002Dw-Oz; Wed, 08 May 2019 02:02:10 -0400 In-reply-to: <87pnou2ak2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Wed, 08 May 2019 00:56:29 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158908 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 00:56:29 +0300 > > bug#28466 caused a regression in 26.0.50. Maybe it's too late to fix it > in the release branch, so the patch below is for master. If you want me to consider installing a change in emacs-26, please show a reproducible recipe, because I don't think I understand the situation where the problematic behavior happens. Thanks.