From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36839: 26.1: unique frame names Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:00:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83imrkkc6y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190729161606.fyjwowadnuwe27zd@E15-2016.optimum.net> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="176173"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36839@debbugs.gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 29 19:02:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hs92I-000jiW-Bc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:02:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55238 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs92H-0000V3-Dx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:02:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs92B-0000Ui-Tg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hs92A-0000ps-WA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40219) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hs92A-0000pi-Pa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs92A-0000Up-MW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36839 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36839-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36839.15644196741825 (code B ref 36839); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36839) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2019 17:01:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49040 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs91N-0000TM-N3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:01:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52930) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs91M-0000TA-4B for 36839@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:01:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hs91G-0000K0-QO; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:01:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1995 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hs91G-0008B8-5M; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:01:06 -0400 In-reply-to: <20190729161606.fyjwowadnuwe27zd@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Mon, 29 Jul 2019 12:16:06 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164054 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 12:16:06 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > > My expectation is that emacs should by default create frames with unique > names, similar to how it uniquely names buffers, by appending a number > to what would otherwise be a duplicate name. Are you sure you don't confuse a frame's name with its title? In general, a frame's name is Emacs's internal business, and is rarely if ever exposed to the user. About the only exception I know of is TTY frames. I'd be interested to know why you care about a frame's name, i.e. what is your use case.