From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38345: 27.0.50; Permanent increase in memory consumption after opening images (or pdfs) Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 09:52:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83immthovt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sgme1ww7.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83o8x0rl6d.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfs2mzo8.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87lfs19shb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a78gn5k5.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83sgm8ox3g.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhgflxmc.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83lfrzq1s1.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0d7w3tt.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83zhgaloc5.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhg7jmjg.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83h82ej03y.fsf@gnu.org> <87r21ick48.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="238789"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: yantar92@gmail.com, 38345@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 06 18:26:35 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1idHNC-000zqT-BA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 18:26:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41876 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1idHNA-00007E-25 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 12:26:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51663) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1idGK4-0005yb-Rk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:19:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idGK2-0003G6-8L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:19:16 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idGK2-000358-3M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:19:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1idGGw-00053u-7g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 16:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38345 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38345-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38345.157564894619405 (code B ref 38345); Fri, 06 Dec 2019 16:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38345) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2019 16:15:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46933 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1idGGg-00052p-03 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:15:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57005) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1idGGa-00050x-2A for 38345@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:15:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idGGN-0007M0-CR; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:15:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1228 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1id8Pn-0001l8-3d; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 02:52:39 -0500 In-reply-to: <87r21ick48.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Noam Postavsky on Thu, 05 Dec 2019 20:34:31 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172956 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Cc: Ihor Radchenko , 38345@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net > Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 20:34:31 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > No. AFAIK, any compilation on GNU/Linus defines DOUG_LEA_MALLOC. > > That's not the case with modern glibc, hence all that trouble with > ralloc, etc during Emacs 25. I was judging by what I see on fencepost.gnu.org, but I guess that isn't "modern" anymore. So does this mean modern glibc has no knobs to tailor its behavior to various needs, like set the threshold for using mmap, etc.? IOW, no more support for the likes of mallopt? If so, perhaps the reports about jemalloc's superior performance should be sent to glibc developers, as they could have a proper advice for that.