From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37849: composable character alternatives in rx Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:36:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83immpd3jk.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="29414"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37849@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 09 14:39:38 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ieJGE-0007YE-4v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:39:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40260 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ieJGC-0005Jl-SL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:39:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52381) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ieJDk-0002fD-EW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:37:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieJDi-0004mM-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46803) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieJDi-0004mA-Gv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ieJDi-0002Jk-Cq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 13:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37849 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37849-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37849.15758985998876 (code B ref 37849); Mon, 09 Dec 2019 13:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37849) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2019 13:36:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52776 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ieJDL-0002J6-5H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:36:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43236) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ieJDK-0002Is-1i for 37849@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:36:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33019) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieJDD-0004Av-Of; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:36:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2656 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ieJDC-0003Jf-Gy; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:36:31 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= on Mon, 9 Dec 2019 12:04:40 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:173105 Archived-At: > From: Mattias Engdegård > Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 12:04:40 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii > > Eli, as a matter of protocol: assuming the union/intersection patch meets no opposition, can it be pushed to master? It is self-contained and should not affect anything outside rx. It's a new feature, so yes, assuming that you've verified it passes all the tests and cannot possibly interfere with any existing code. Thanks.