From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44068: 28.0.50; Faulty uses of tabulated-list-format Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 05:27:30 +0200 Message-ID: <83imance71.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87imb7e242.fsf@gmx.net> <83zh4ipbli.fsf@gnu.org> <877drm13j3.fsf@gmx.net> <831rhuoy36.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2k2yqqb.fsf@gmx.net> <87h7qori97.fsf@gmx.net> <874kmcfy2h.fsf@rub.de> <875z6rmlrj.fsf@rub.de> <87r1pcu155.fsf@rub.de> <83tuu7d6of.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtzz4c6y.fsf@rub.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23054"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 44068@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 03 04:28:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kZmzR-0005u2-QU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 04:28:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49184 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZmzQ-0002kq-9J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:28:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55062) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZmzK-0002ki-Ad for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZmzK-0004Ee-1B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZmzJ-0007xk-TG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 03:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44068 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44068-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44068.160437406930589 (code B ref 44068); Tue, 03 Nov 2020 03:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44068) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2020 03:27:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43097 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZmz6-0007xI-PB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:27:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZmz4-0007x6-ET for 44068@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:27:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZmyy-0004CM-RP; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:27:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1578 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kZmyw-0002Vf-Sl; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:27:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mtzz4c6y.fsf@rub.de> (message from Stephen Berman on Mon, 02 Nov 2020 23:37:57 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:192585 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 44068@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 23:37:57 +0100 > > >> Thanks. Eli, is that ok with you? > > > > Any reason I might not be okay with it? > > I hope not ;-). > > > (I cannot say I've read every > > message in this thread to the last word.) > > Assuming the patch doesn't introduce a bug, it's essentially a question > of aesthetics, and since Stefan K said it looks good to him, that's good > enough for me, but since you asked for such a change upthread > <83zh4ipbli.fsf@gnu.org>, I wanted to make sure you also accept the > result. Can you describe the result? I don't think I have a clear idea what it will be. Thanks.