From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46238: 27.1; recenter-top-bottom in fullscreen Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:20:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83im7a5wek.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tuqvpzw2.fsf@do> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15972"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: okay@toyful.space, 46238@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 02 16:51:02 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xxG-00041b-6Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:51:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36658 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xxF-00084G-6B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:51:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xUG-0001LV-JG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:21:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xUE-0002Nq-IJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:21:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xUE-0007yZ-Dt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 15:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46238 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46238-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46238.161227925030621 (code B ref 46238); Tue, 02 Feb 2021 15:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Feb 2021 15:20:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xU1-0007xn-9C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:20:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42108) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xTy-0007xS-Hz for 46238@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:20:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47895) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xTr-0002GZ-Qj; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:20:39 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1457 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xTa-0007ip-VV; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:20:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from martin rudalics on Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:42:28 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199147 Archived-At: > From: martin rudalics > Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:42:28 +0100 > > Reading it for the first time, 'recenter-top-bottom' has an incredibly > misleading doc-string: For me "Move current buffer line to the specified > window line" means to (1) remove the buffer line at point from its > buffer and (2) reinsert it at the window line specified by ARG but I > doubt that that's the intended behavior. Maybe someone more > knowledgeable could make it more reasonable, maybe stealing text like > "positions the current line at the top of the window" from 'recenter'. Is the below better? "Scroll the window so that current line is at the middle of the window. Successive invocations scroll the window in a cyclical order to put the current line at certain places within the window, as determined by `recenter-positions'. By default, the second invocation puts the current line at the top-most window line, the third invocation puts it on the bottom-most window line, and then the order is reused. With numeric prefix ARG, move current line ARG lines below the window top. With plain `C-u', move current line to window center."