From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46583: 28.0.50; nested minibuffers Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:31:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83im6p5tx8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v9aqil93.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83zh025vg8.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9aqe9am.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83o8gi5t6a.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6s1n1rx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37192"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, 46583@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 15:32:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkLi-0009Yl-Bi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:32:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48020 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkLh-0005o4-CY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkLa-0005nu-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34930) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkLa-00065n-8b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkLa-00084f-4L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46583 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46583.161365869631006 (code B ref 46583); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2021 14:31:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46476 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkLA-000841-4x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:31:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40294) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkL8-00083o-7H for 46583@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:31:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42487) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkL2-0005s1-IC; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:31:28 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4650 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkKt-0003AQ-Le; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:31:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87a6s1n1rx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:39:54 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200255 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Cc: rms@gnu.org, 46583@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:39:54 +0200 > > > It prevents messages from overwriting minibuffer prompts. And both of > > the bugs you mentioned seem to be about messages that overwrite such > > prompts. So what am I missing? > > Sorry for mentioning old bugs that added confusion to this bug report. > What we have now is a new bug found by Richard: > > I save a file that is read-only, so I am asked > > File phones is write-protected; try to save anyway? (yes or no) > > Then I type C-x b and it tries to read a buffer name. > > I could send a patch that fixes this bug. Thanks. I hoped first to understand why we bind enable-recursive-minibuffers in these cases, but if you prefer to begin with a patch, please do, and let's take it from there.