From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47024: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Warnings from async compilations truncated Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 05:24:30 +0200 Message-ID: <83im5zpu6p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sg54p6cl.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13954"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47024@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 10 04:25:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJpTB-0003Up-N7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 04:25:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39754 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJpTA-0006q0-PN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:25:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJpT4-0006ph-6K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJpT3-0004FU-VA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:25:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJpT3-00006h-S4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:25:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 03:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47024 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47024-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47024.1615346680378 (code B ref 47024); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 03:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47024) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2021 03:24:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48385 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJpSi-000062-KT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:24:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51280) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJpSh-00005q-EQ for 47024@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:24:39 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJpSb-000428-7j; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:24:33 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1397 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lJpSa-0005F6-EI; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:24:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Tue, 09 Mar 2021 20:37:57 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201955 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: 47024@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 20:37:57 +0000 > > > Warning (comp): seq.el:396:16: Warning: `seq-contains' is an obsolete generic function (as of Disable showing Disable logging > > > > Note the truncation after "(as of". > > > > Why does this happen? can it be fixed? > > ATM we capture each Warning (or error) with the following regexp: > "^.*+?\\(?:Error\\|Warning\\): .*$" > > So I expect we match the full line (if is a multi line diagnostic we'll > loose what's following). The message comes from a sub-process, right? Could it be that we match prematurely, when only part of the text was received?