From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47067: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Crash while scrolling through dispnew.c Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:21:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83im5ugpym.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sg52lykn.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv8lrmf.fsf@gnu.org> <83czw4lelg.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv8jgn2.fsf@gnu.org> <834khfjv7q.fsf@gnu.org> <83tupfia1m.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv7hy5c.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0qbhvnh.fsf@gnu.org> <83czw3hu5f.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0qagtfe.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36348"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, 47067@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 14 08:22:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLL4i-0009Jr-Gt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:22:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40756 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLL4h-0007Xu-Fu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:22:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLL4b-0007Xn-VK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:22:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLL4b-000759-Oc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:22:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLL4b-0008O1-L8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:22:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47067 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47067-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47067.161570651532223 (code B ref 47067); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2021 07:21:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLL4U-0008Ne-Si for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:21:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33354) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLL4T-0008NR-5R for 47067@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:21:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLL4N-0006wB-R7; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:21:47 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2630 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lLL4N-00066e-3a; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:21:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:53:01 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202339 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, 47067@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:53:01 +0000 > > > If someone can send a patch, I could try it. TIA. > > Should be what Pip suggested here > Shouldn't that bump the ABI number as well?