From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46926: Remove the quotes from highlighted/linked symbols when displaying docs Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:28:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83im5rdy7l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83czw3jy72.fsf@gnu.org> <835z1vjvm4.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft0zhuyi.fsf@gnu.org> <838s6rhthh.fsf@gnu.org> <6214567e-7e89-010d-5d0a-de0b69392625@yandex.ru> <831rcgfgpd.fsf@gnu.org> <401c0b82-a6b9-eb74-8de8-84fc956f8813@yandex.ru> <83pmzzepn7.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8fje0nd.fsf@gnu.org> <79df20bdf4e23c709781@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17721"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46926@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 16 14:32:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lM9o1-0004V0-A6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:32:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59262 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lM9o0-00035b-CI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:32:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lM9ks-0000gx-Eh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lM9ks-0002jZ-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lM9ks-0006au-35 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46926 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46926-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46926.161590131925314 (code B ref 46926); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46926) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2021 13:28:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lM9kU-0006aE-M2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:28:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38778) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lM9kT-0006a1-D1 for 46926@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:28:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lM9kO-0002R6-2z; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:28:32 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4601 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lM9kM-00051c-Uk; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:28:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <79df20bdf4e23c709781@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:01:36 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202461 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:01:36 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: 46926@debbugs.gnu.org > > > And if we gathered enough feedback, then why are we once again disputing > > whether "M-o M-o" is an important binding, and if so, where to move it? > > > > I don't see any dispute. > > You (and two other people) mentioned that you want to keep the > functionality of "M-o M-o" in vanilla Emacs. > > Stefan M explained that "M-o M-o" = font-lock-fontify-block does not work > well, and that he would like to deprecate it. > > I proposed a font-lock-update command that would be bound on "C-x x f", > and said that while the "C-x x f" binding is less convenient than "M-o > M-o", this regression is (largely?) compensated by the fact that > font-lock-update works correctly, unlike font-lock-fontify-block. > Moreover, the font-lock-update command is also more general, as it can be > used to correctly toggle Font Lock mode, which M-x font-lock-mode can't > do. That's the "dispute" I alluded to. If the word "dispute" is unfortunate here, I take it back, but the main point remains: the issue is still under discussion, with new aspects being revealed and discussed, so it doesn't sound like we gathered enough feedback to allow us to make a decision, not yet anyway.