From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47699: [PATCH] Improve completion-list-mode-map Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 11:34:10 +0300 Message-ID: <83im4t43ul.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3755fe92dcbf588701ae@heytings.org> <83o8el46rs.fsf@gnu.org> <3755fe92dc6b58671717@heytings.org> <83k0p944s5.fsf@gnu.org> <3755fe92dc4a9ba66a0b@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10183"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47699@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 11 10:35:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lVVYr-0002X5-IA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 10:35:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41456 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVVYq-0002aF-Kf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 04:35:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVVYd-0002Zy-17 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 04:35:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42410) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVVYb-0001VO-TN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 04:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVVYb-0003TD-RG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 04:35:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 08:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47699 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 47699-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47699.161813007513303 (code B ref 47699); Sun, 11 Apr 2021 08:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47699) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2021 08:34:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVVYA-0003SV-Sk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 04:34:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51468) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVVY9-0003SK-PW for 47699@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 04:34:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58835) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVVY4-00018P-Gs; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 04:34:28 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3538 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lVVY4-00041F-07; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 04:34:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3755fe92dc4a9ba66a0b@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Sun, 11 Apr 2021 08:31:00 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203834 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 08:31:00 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: 47699@debbugs.gnu.org > > > (And how does one switch back without closing the window that shows > > completions?) > > C-x o. Perhaps it would make sense to bind "o" for this, too. And/or > "Q". WDYT? 'o' could be a good idea, IMO. But I'm puzzled by the lack of symmetry: why bind M-v when "C-x o" is available. But I guess that ship sailed long ago.