From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49055: 28.0.50; [PATCH] De-obfuscate gnutls_handshake loop Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 16:37:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83im2avuuu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zgvqd35s.fsf@dick> <87zgvmyost.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18351"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 49055@debbugs.gnu.org, dick.r.chiang@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 19 15:38:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lubAo-0004ZK-Sk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 15:38:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42780 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lubAn-0002Ao-00 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lubAg-0002Ad-FM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lubAg-0004Nr-80 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lubAg-00075M-63 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 13:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49055 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 49055-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49055.162410983027178 (code B ref 49055); Sat, 19 Jun 2021 13:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49055) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2021 13:37:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58832 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lub9p-00074H-Up for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45254) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lub9n-000744-Rz for 49055@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36366) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lub9i-0003bf-JQ; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2220 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lub9i-0003Tm-6Z; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:37:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zgvmyost.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sat, 19 Jun 2021 15:19:46 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208738 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 15:19:46 +0200 > Cc: 49055@debbugs.gnu.org > > dick.r.chiang@gmail.com writes: > > > I need to figure out why, but until > > then can we make the relevant loop less confusing? > > I think that makes sense, so I've now applied your patch to Emacs 28. The code wasn't really 100% equivalent, though.