From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50009: 28.0.50; add CRLF to outgoing ERC protocol logger lines Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 08:42:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83ilz19ius.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v94chxbh.fsf@neverwas.me> <87czpb4ilx.fsf@neverwas.me> <87v9335te6.fsf@dick> <87lf3y7pic.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf3xpzkb.fsf@dick> <87bl4ts7xv.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5133"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50009@debbugs.gnu.org, dick.r.chiang@gmail.com, jp@neverwas.me To: Amin Bandali Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 16 07:43:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mQkAy-00019j-JQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 07:43:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48284 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQkAw-0005R4-QU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 01:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48244) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQkAo-0005Qq-Fi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 01:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42061) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQkAo-0003Pw-7r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 01:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQkAo-0006PT-32 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 01:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 05:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50009 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 50009-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50009.163177096724615 (code B ref 50009); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 05:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50009) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2021 05:42:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQkAZ-0006Ou-Au for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 01:42:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQkAW-0006Oh-8i for 50009@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 01:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQkAQ-00036T-Ki; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 01:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4885 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQkAQ-0007Hr-6u; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 01:42:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bl4ts7xv.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Amin Bandali on Wed, 15 Sep 2021 20:03:24 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:214445 Archived-At: > From: Amin Bandali > Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 20:03:24 -0400 > Cc: 50009@debbugs.gnu.org, "J.P." > > dick writes: > > > Sigh, it pains me to have to add to the verbiage maelstrom that is debbugs > > when the antiquity of GNU patch is self-evident. > > To be clear, GNU is by far not the only project that uses patch-driven > workflows. This discussion doesn't belong here. Here we discus a specific issue submitted to the Emacs issue tracker. Broad discussions about our development workflows should be held on emacs-devel. Please move it there (if you must have this discussion, which is about the umpteenth time it is being brought up, including very recently). Whatever you do, please STOP discussing it here. Right now, the only effect this has is to make following the discussions of bug#50009 much harder by polluting it with unrelated messages, which are not even tangents.