From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56682: Fix the long lines font locking related slowdowns Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2022 21:09:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83iln6zhn1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837d46mjen.fsf@gnu.org> <8a3eaeef01be5bfaa5ef@heytings.org> <05388e8d8812bfa3695d@heytings.org> <83v8rf5894.fsf@gnu.org> <65cb7c73fd4a999cca00@heytings.org> <8c7321f2f3400a5db9be@heytings.org> <8c7321f2f388e5343475@heytings.org> <8c7321f2f36494299e61@heytings.org> <83v8rc2n1h.fsf@gnu.org> <64084296-1953-8ef8-5938-adfb6fb9b43f@yandex.ru> <83r11uzs8n.fsf@gnu.org> <14845631-c2ef-8371-8606-c858092e3192@yandex.ru> <83mtcizov2.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4229"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 56682@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 05 20:11:10 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oK1mw-0000xA-55 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 20:11:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59360 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oK1mv-00039c-0n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:11:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oK1mo-00038w-J7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oK1mo-0004yx-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oK1mo-00060s-6C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2022 18:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56682 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56682-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56682.165972300323015 (code B ref 56682); Fri, 05 Aug 2022 18:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56682) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2022 18:10:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60522 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oK1lq-0005z0-2g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58658) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oK1lo-0005yh-V2 for 56682@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:10:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42792) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oK1lj-0004g9-Bh; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:09:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=etkBFW7wV8WAwg7K6LQli8ph396KJUZA5p2vCbUHdxQ=; b=FIPIWFDI1J07 7dekFTiG8o8jZp8BuBXHVWzk634NxJZY7/F+aTzkoH2qwp5M78acibk6Ar0gOcsJuhLw483dB3i7v XMh6RWiKQLbjOwIQjCJocrlzrjITrCitYY7UYS2RwJM2GSo6dPlgvzug1qAf2dsdlDGryOTwOrTiB cMTWMVp7pqBnpTlECGxOTvRuAsa3tCBzSSLer5deW2b9TIigYcbnPRv1mhN8wTK9eUu+EmGL1jLoz M6zZ1YwFLwaIzqXYSlODO0mJUpuGYUak0ZpdFWunRv1MfgP6iMyodaBqOOPlpLW9jr2gZqsSBHgRc 1R/jWWhSpZC1sTTQB0PwJQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4733 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oK1lj-0004zx-0H; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:09:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 5 Aug 2022 20:32:32 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:238935 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 20:32:32 +0300 > Cc: 56682@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 05.08.2022 18:33, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 17:41:51 +0300 > >> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 56682@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org > >> From: Dmitry Gutov > >> > I think I have > >>>> demonstrated that the remaining slowdown can be caused purely by the > >>>> length of the buffer and how long 'parse-partial-sexp' takes to parse > >>>> it. > >>> > >>> No, you haven't demonstrated that. > >> > >> Apply the patch for xdisp.c that I have sent previously (it will be at > >> the end of this email too) and recompile Emacs. > >> > >> Now try two different scenarios. 1,2a and 1,2b. > >> > >> 1. Visit dictionary.json. It will ask you whether to open such big file > >> literally, but after you answer 'y', it will display the beginning of > >> the file quickly. > >> 2a) Evaluate (benchmark 1 '(save-excursion (parse-partial-sexp 1 > >> (point-max)))), note the reported delay. > >> > >> Kill and re-visit the file. > >> > >> 1. (same as before) > >> 2b) Press M->, note the delay you see. > >> > >> The delays in scenarios 1,2a and 1,2b should be ~the same. They are so > >> in my testing. > >> > >> Or try this scenario: 1,2a,2b. Step 2b should work instantly here. > > > > How is (parse-partial-sexp 1 (point-max)) related to the issue at > > hand? > > I said: > > >>>> I think I have > >>>> demonstrated that the remaining slowdown can be caused purely by the > >>>> length of the buffer and how long 'parse-partial-sexp' takes to parse > >>>> it. > > You said: > > >>> No, you haven't demonstrated that. > > ...and now you are asking why we are talking about parse-partial-sexp? Yes, because a user who visits a file doesn't invoke parse-partial-sexp.