From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51490: Show an indicator when Emacs is busy somewhere in the Emacs window Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 14:49:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83illhueuo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wnm27b57.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfwq75q4.fsf@gnus.org> <87wnm22q7y.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee8a2pm7.fsf@gnu.org> <87fssq2orj.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmru18xg.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf2i18pv.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7d618j7.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl3e2m1y.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmrtz1y7.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmrt1bsa.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26hxm8a.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0hvviiu.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6iqr8il.fsf@gnus.org> <87r107nmq7.fsf@gnus.org> <83y1uewa55.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsgl7zri.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5875"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 51490@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 21 13:56:19 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oayKw-0001My-V7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:56:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44154 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oayKv-0002Ha-Py for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:56:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oayEt-0005rq-BG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oayEs-0001vo-ME for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oayEs-0002uU-Fu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:50:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51490 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 51490-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51490.166376097711151 (code B ref 51490); Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51490) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2022 11:49:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60968 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oayET-0002tn-I2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:49:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oayEQ-0002ta-QY for 51490@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:49:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oayEK-0001rp-6b; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:49:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=LMDmUuRNzgjfOaNVifAvq7T7zBuqwh6UCQrs3OkQC7Y=; b=IaqiL3XdwUVw nwf7SClj9KZ6VnojKYGQTiOSkcYe3tejjYkXcpVlhnldceCBp+BxFXI97v1QLm6Y3QRYyZ2xzfOZJ 3JIApWXxHeYmuU9sGOC0yC4sdweiSsq+NfIwzBgsAYG33CZqL7oCd9E8IN75MpmC8/Rg22JN1CTA0 1RRy63Ljb28Cpa4Q/f+rKO9eSpuAhpScCjctJxZRJIpAMsQYevrOP64u6smxwtIwT3Dkh88h7q8Zi vTfcXrSO9aJsmdmrD7W25bPcJSgMfH/fp2aif/5hmfiqS12et8qusQXbJ9az4tw/j3etx0+/rRrdn Zumq191CdO3BJuulEsk3MQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4318 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oayEJ-0002d7-L9; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:49:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fsgl7zri.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:06:25 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243312 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 51490@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:06:25 +0200 > > > If so, what are you trying to save by "modifying the glyphs directly", > > and why do you think doing so will produce some savings, as opposed to > > just update the mode line normally? > > Because this will be happening from an alarm while Lisp code is running, > and we can't run other Lisp code while that is happening. Mode line is drawn in C, not in Lisp. And if the problem is that we cannot run the display code, either, then how would it help to poke the glyph? It won't be shown on the glass, because redisplay cannot run. Right? Or what am I missing?