From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6539: ispell-complete-word looks for wrong file (at least on w32) Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:23:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83hbkd949z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20100630103826.GA3847@agmartin.aq.upm.es> <20100630122747.GA20074@agmartin.aq.upm.es> <836310bezc.fsf@gnu.org> <20100705115222.GA2013@agmartin.aq.upm.es> <83mxu59716.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq4t96a8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278354602 5728 80.91.229.12 (5 Jul 2010 18:30:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 18:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: agustin.martin@hispalinux.es, 6539@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 05 20:29:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVqQU-0007J7-Of for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 20:29:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OVqQU-000680-1f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:29:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39467 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OVqQO-00067g-4p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:29:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVqQL-0007lg-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:29:48 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVqQL-0007lY-Ey for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:29:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVqMk-0005G8-D9; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6539 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6539.127835433120209 (code B ref 6539); Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2010 18:25:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVqMF-0005Ft-43 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:25:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVqMC-0005Fm-Le for 6539@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:25:29 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L5300900KF0VZ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 6539@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:25:23 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.253.155]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L53002O5KI9WYJ0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:25:21 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:26:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:38246 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 19:55:28 +0200 > Cc: agustin.martin@hispalinux.es, 6539@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Why does it matter which file names are tried, if the net result will > > be the same: to fail? > > I thought I did explain that above. The unix style file names can > happen to work on the current default drive if the user did place the > required files there. The chances of the user accidentally putting the file in the same directory where Ispell looks for it, which doesn't exist on Windows and needs to be created, are slim. The chances of doing that without looking at ispell.el and discovering the defcustom and its default value are even more slim. So I think your fears are entirely imaginary, and the problem you describe does not exist in practice.