From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7494: 24.0.50; Why is `prefix-region' in a library by itself? Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:35:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83hbf26aqb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5CD13207D93D40739A6E3AB9B3733186@us.oracle.com> <831v676vdl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290872702 2388 80.91.229.12 (27 Nov 2010 15:45:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7494@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 27 16:44:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMMxN-0002hk-5b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:44:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51478 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMMxM-0002U3-Di for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:44:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35395 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMMxI-0002Tt-7v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:44:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMMxG-00013c-Vd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:44:52 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMMxG-00013L-Tu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:44:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMMh0-0000zE-98; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:28:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7494 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7494-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7494.12908716753779 (code B ref 7494); Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7494) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2010 15:27:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMMgt-0000yu-Bd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:27:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMMgq-0000ya-ME for 7494@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:27:53 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LCJ00L00V2GXI00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 7494@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:33:00 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.63.39]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LCJ00L56V6YB360@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:33:00 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:28:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41927 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Drew Adams , 7494@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 09:20:54 -0500 > > >> You are certainly very quick when it doesn't count. ;-) > > It's unfair to post such comments. > > Well, when compared to some of my backlog where I still have posts more > than 2 years old, it's probably not that unfair. It's unfair to assume that you handle quickly bugs that are unimportant, but leave alone the important ones.