From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8006: 23.2.93; rmail-mime says "Not a MIME message" Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 06:02:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83hbcdsvne.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k4has1uv.fsf@gnu.org> <8739ny12fe.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297224380 10665 80.91.229.12 (9 Feb 2011 04:06:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 04:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8006@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 09 05:06:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn1Jk-0005ad-VN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 05:06:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32901 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pn1Jk-0005H7-BF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:06:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37640 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pn1Jg-0005Gs-Bo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:06:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn1Jf-0005bs-7o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:06:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn1Jf-0005bo-0v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:06:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn17x-0002AD-MO; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:54:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 03:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8006 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8006-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8006.12972236058273 (code B ref 8006); Wed, 09 Feb 2011 03:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8006) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2011 03:53:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn17M-00029O-J8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:53:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pn17K-00029C-50 for 8006@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:53:22 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LGC009000CZSK00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 8006@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 06:01:59 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.171.5]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LGC009C80J9JG50@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 06:01:59 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <8739ny12fe.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:54:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44012 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Cc: 8006@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:23:17 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > It seems like iff a message doesn't have the Mime-Version header, > > typing `v' (rmail-mime) in the Rmail buffer signals an error "Not a > > MIME message". Is this expected? Sounds like a misfeature to me. > > You mean a MIME message with no Mime-Version header? No, it was a plain ASCII message with a single-part body. > What mailer sends that? sendmail.el+smtpmail.el