From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:46:39 +0200 Message-ID: <83hb101eqo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87aa71mwng.fsf@picasso.cante.net> <4EE270AA.2080702@cornell.edu> <20111210095858.GA19881@cante.cante.net> <4EE742B0.1080703@cornell.edu> <20111213140042.GA22678@picasso.cante.net> <4EE76B6E.7070904@cornell.edu> <4EE7B2A9.6060308@cornell.edu> <4EE8178F.5040004@cornell.edu> <87liqf1t04.fsf@picasso.cante.net> <4EE89590.2040503@cornell.edu> <4EE89CAB.8080301@cornell.edu> <4EE8B064.8080803@cornell.edu> <83fwgn2h8a.fsf@gnu.org> <4EE8E376.7080309@cornell.edu> <4EE95EBB.5040504@cornell.edu> <83d3bq32gw.fsf@gnu.org> <4EEA0759.5040403@cornell.edu> <4EEB9DFA.8040000@cornell.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324064915 23005 80.91.229.12 (16 Dec 2011 19:48:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10257@debbugs.gnu.org, jari.aalto@cante.net To: Ken Brown Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 16 20:48:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rbdld-0004T1-Tj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:48:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rbdld-0006Zo-F5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:48:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60784) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rbdlb-0006Zj-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:48:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rbdla-0000UO-2Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:48:27 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbdlZ-0000UE-UC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:48:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rbdn8-0001eX-5z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10257 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10257-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10257.13240649646298 (code B ref 10257); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10257) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2011 19:49:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbdmV-0001dT-T9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:49:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbdmS-0001dK-LC for 10257@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:49:21 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LWB00000ARNJT00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 10257@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:46:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.39.203]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LWB000YAAXNIW20@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:46:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4EEB9DFA.8040000@cornell.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:50:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55023 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:37:30 -0500 > From: Ken Brown > CC: 10257@debbugs.gnu.org, jari.aalto@cante.net, > Stefan Monnier > > Jari has confirmed in private email that it works, but he has proposed > making it slightly more permissive and having check_writable return > success if either UID or GID is -1. The rationale is the same as > before: If euidaccess returns failure but either UID or GID is -1, then > the result of euidaccess is unreliable. The revised patch is below. > > Eli, do you see any problem with this extra permissiveness? No, I was thinking along the same lines.