From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10578: 24.0.92; No png images on OpenSUSE 12.1 Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:12:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83hazn38tp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y5sz1ztp.fsf@linux-hvfx.site> <83k44j3djg.fsf@gnu.org> <83ipk339sj.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327255991 10085 80.91.229.12 (22 Jan 2012 18:13:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10578@debbugs.gnu.org To: larsi@gnus.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 22 19:12:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rp1uT-0002l8-LC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:12:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33642 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rp1uT-0006XH-42 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:12:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rp1uP-0006Wy-NX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:12:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rp1uO-0001E9-Pt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:12:53 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rp1uO-0001E5-N9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:12:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rp1uY-0001u7-65 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10578 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10578-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10578.13272559717302 (code B ref 10578); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10578) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jan 2012 18:12:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40202 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rp1uM-0001ti-R9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:12:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:48361) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rp1uK-0001tV-FT for 10578@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:12:49 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LY700H00P34G200@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 10578@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:12:32 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.215.109]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LY700HVUP8VDC60@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:12:31 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <83ipk339sj.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55911 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:51:40 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 10578@debbugs.gnu.org > > > 1) Why didn't the warnings appear in the echo area instead of just > > hiding out in the *Messages* buffer? > > Most probably because they are emitted during redisplay, and you > cannot have anything displayed in the echo area at redisplay time, > because doing so re-enters redisplay, which will again produce the > same error message, etc., ad nauseam (a.k.a. infloop). The message is logged by image_error that has this commentary: /* Log error message with format string FORMAT and argument ARG. Signaling an error, e.g. when an image cannot be loaded, is not a good idea because this would interrupt redisplay, and the error message display would lead to another redisplay. This function therefore simply displays a message. */ (That last "displays" should be "logs".)