From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9496: 24.0.50; Segfault on TAB-only composition Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:58:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83haz7dqz9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8739g0tcp5.fsf@gnu.org> <4F2C355D.6020302@cs.ucla.edu> <83ipjnehnp.fsf@gnu.org> <4F2C5AB4.3080500@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328338774 16417 80.91.229.3 (4 Feb 2012 06:59:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 06:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9496@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 04 07:59:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtZat-00082M-Pp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:59:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46862 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtZat-0003J1-DR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:59:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38749) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtZap-0003Iu-UR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:59:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtZao-0002by-Fq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:59:27 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtZao-0002bK-C3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:59:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtZbO-0003xT-Lp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9496 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9496-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9496.132833878115166 (code B ref 9496); Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9496) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2012 06:59:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53035 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtZb3-0003wZ-0K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:59:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:45130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtZax-0003wI-2O for 9496@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:59:39 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LYU00500W2JAR00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 9496@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:58:51 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.139.211]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LYU005Q0WQ27C60@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:58:50 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4F2C5AB4.3080500@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56460 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:07:48 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: 9496@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 02/03/2012 01:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > how in the world could it _ever_ overflow a > > 32-bit integer?? > > (setq tab-width 1000) > (standard-display-ascii 256 (make-string 2147484 ?\t)) Then don't do that.