From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10960: linum-mode does not work properly when changing font size Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:11:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83hay1a9b4.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331057577 28341 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2012 18:12:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10960@debbugs.gnu.org, l26wang@gmail.com To: Glenn Morris , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 06 19:12:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S4ysZ-00014I-El for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:12:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55059 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4ysY-0006cs-NX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:12:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4ysP-0006bp-3M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:12:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4ysI-0005ng-Q3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:12:44 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57584) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4ysI-0005nX-Mi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:12:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S4ysg-0005iM-8I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10960 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10960-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10960.133105757121950 (code B ref 10960); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10960) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2012 18:12:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36183 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S4ysV-0005hp-HZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:12:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:44389) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S4ysI-0005hQ-P2 for 10960@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:12:40 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M0H000006DOD800@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 10960@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:11:43 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.223.165]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M0H000N46JFAH40@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:11:41 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57540 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:07:37 -0500 > Cc: 10960@debbugs.gnu.org > > Le Wang wrote: > > > Here is the stackoverflow question: > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9304192/emacs-linum-mode-and-size-of-font-unreadable-line-numbers > > Here is the existing Emacs report > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=1255 I don't understand Stefan's response in that bug: what effect exactly are text-scale-* functions supposed to produce? Should the text in the margins be enlarged to the same size as the text in the "text area" of the window, or should the text in the margins retain its original size? And whichever of these two is TRT, why is this considered to be a problem in linum-mode, and not in the infrastructure (a.k.a. the display engine)?