From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13159: 24.3.50; `find-file-noselect' should not display or log messages Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:08:30 +0200 Message-ID: <83hanpome9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pq2dooak.fsf@gnu.org> <6A38AFC4493E45BB8A6CF3271C02EF2E@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355422174 28271 80.91.229.3 (13 Dec 2012 18:09:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13159@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 13 19:09:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjDDw-0002PY-2s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:09:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56588 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjDDj-0001qT-56 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:09:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjDDd-0001pF-B9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:09:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjDDZ-0007V3-AK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjDDZ-0007Ux-7W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:09:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjDEQ-0007YU-CL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13159 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13159-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13159.135542217628986 (code B ref 13159); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2012 18:09:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41232 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjDE0-0007XS-2C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:09:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:56899) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjDDy-0007XJ-3R for 13159@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:09:34 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MEZ00400EA0XS00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 13159@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:08:32 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MEZ004K0EE7TC40@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:08:32 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <6A38AFC4493E45BB8A6CF3271C02EF2E@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68472 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <13159@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:46:18 -0800 > > a. not have parameter NOWARN treat non-warning messages the same as warnings > and, > > b. especially, add the file name to all file-specific messages, including > warnings. > > Does that make sense? Could be some additional value of NOWARN, perhaps.