From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22815: 25.0.91; emacs-module.* Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 10:19:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83h9gud0pl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lh67et0e.fsf@gnu.org> <5098.1456478165@smr00> <83d1rjercx.fsf@gnu.org> <1298.1456481397@smr00> <83y4a7coqo.fsf@gnu.org> <4539.1456528899@smr00> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456561284 12480 80.91.229.3 (27 Feb 2016 08:21:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22815@debbugs.gnu.org To: ohki@gssm.otsuka.tsukuba.ac.jp, Daniel Colascione , John Wiegley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 27 09:21:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aZa7i-00063l-Sa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:21:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53799 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZa7h-0001So-T4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZa7d-0001ST-VA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:21:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZa7Z-0006Gd-Tk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:21:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51029) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZa7Z-0006GZ-QH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:21:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZa7Z-0001Jo-Jr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22815 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22815-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22815.14565612225013 (code B ref 22815); Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22815) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2016 08:20:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48156 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZa6w-0001In-AK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:20:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49943) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZa6u-0001Ia-Jx for 22815@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:20:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZa6o-00062T-NF for 22815@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:20:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZa6k-000624-8k; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:20:10 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3959 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aZa6j-0004F7-Fl; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:20:09 -0500 In-reply-to: <4539.1456528899@smr00> (ohki@gssm.otsuka.tsukuba.ac.jp) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113934 Archived-At: > From: ohki@gssm.otsuka.tsukuba.ac.jp > Cc: ohki@gssm.otsuka.tsukuba.ac.jp, 22815@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:21:39 +0900 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > From: ohki@gssm.otsuka.tsukuba.ac.jp > > > Cc: ohki@gssm.otsuka.tsukuba.ac.jp, 22815@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 19:09:57 +0900 > > > > > > > I was asking why couldn't the plug-in do the conversion, e.g., by > > > > using libiconv? Emacs is not the only piece of software that knows > > > > how to convert from one encoding to another. > > > > > > I considered using libiconv once, but Emacs has the conversion > > > capability, so why not use it. > > > > Because it can signal an error, if the encoding you pass is not a > > valid coding-system that Emacs recognizes? > > Yes it does! > In the course of developing my plugin, > I encountered `Invalid coding system' message, and Emacs keep working > (no crash, no hangup). It's all too easy to get that, since Emacs coding-systems have names that are rarely used elsewhere. And using libiconv is easy enough. So I'm uneasy about this. What do others think?