From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net
Cc: 24633@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#24633: highlight-region func using (window-hscroll) in :align-to spec can cause inf loop
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2016 15:42:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83h98lg0cn.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lgxxvh6o.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs@users.sourceforge.net)
> From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net
> Cc: 24633@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2016 08:29:51 -0400
>
> Anyway, it doesn't seem worth going through this complexity. I just
> wonder if there is some way to stop bad lisp code from triggering a hard
> lockup. Can the display engine notice if it's looping and throw some
> kind of error? Maybe unset pre-redisplay-functions?
I don't see how we could detect loops in general. But for the
particular case of infinite hscrolling, we could perhaps count the
number of times hscroll_windows was called and returned a non-zero
value, and forcibly stop the loop after some reasonable number of
iterations.
Patches welcome. Could be a nice small project for someone who wants
to gain practice with hacking the display engine.
> >> >> According to `(elisp) Pixel Specification',
> >> >>
> >> >> The form NUM specifies a fraction of the default frame font height
> >> >> or width. The form `(NUM)' specifies an absolute number of pixels.
> >> >
> >> > I admire your courage in reading that documentation and then writing
> >> > stuff like the above, which the documentation doesn't mention even
> >> > remotely.
> >>
> >> Uh, not sure how to read this, is it irony?
> >
> > Only a little. I find this area severely under-documented.
>
> The grammar in the doc seems complete to me.
Do you really think that a formal grammar, whether accurate/complete
or not, is a good way of describing a feature?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-09 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-07 1:01 bug#24633: highlight-region func using (window-hscroll) in :align-to spec can cause inf loop npostavs
2016-10-08 11:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 17:17 ` npostavs
2016-10-08 18:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-08 19:18 ` npostavs
2016-10-08 19:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-09 12:29 ` npostavs
2016-10-09 12:42 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2016-10-22 19:27 ` npostavs
2016-10-22 19:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-22 20:43 ` npostavs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83h98lg0cn.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=24633@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).