From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26925: Improve /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string) documentation Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:46:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83h8zxb02p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <93AB3C85-27C1-48FF-8C3D-B90B4CF33670@gmail.com> <83o9up2hli.fsf@gnu.org> <7F0AE9BE-93FF-4CF7-8F76-AE1BD0CFDDDC@gmail.com> <83inkx2eeu.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaoxoty1.fsf@rosalinde> <3D9A3600-CF3D-4DD9-866C-CBEE8F692B25@gmail.com> <83o9u5bde1.fsf@gnu.org> <12A8E2CE-F2F5-4DB9-88DE-BCD40513EEBA@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496501303 10246 195.159.176.226 (3 Jun 2017 14:48:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 26925@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net To: Jean-Christophe Helary Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 03 16:48:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHALe-00026u-5N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 16:48:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53915 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHALi-000524-U9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:48:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHALX-00050U-Cz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHALS-0006wg-Ba for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHALS-0006wc-7W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHALR-0002pV-UQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26925 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 26925-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26925.149650124110828 (code B ref 26925); Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26925) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2017 14:47:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53983 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHAKn-0002oa-6P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:47:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49692) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHAKl-0002oL-Bx for 26925@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHAKb-0006ML-6H for 26925@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:47:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHAKb-0006M8-3M; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:47:09 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2703 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dHAKZ-0005MF-Un; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:47:08 -0400 In-reply-to: <12A8E2CE-F2F5-4DB9-88DE-BCD40513EEBA@gmail.com> (message from Jean-Christophe Helary on Sat, 3 Jun 2017 22:50:55 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133221 Archived-At: > From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 22:50:55 +0900 > Cc: stephen.berman@gmx.net, > 26925@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> -If the optional argument @var{trim} > >> → > >> +If @var{trim} > >> > >> just to adapt the text to the description of the other arguments. > > > > Thanks, but I see no problem with the current text. We use both > > styles intermittently. > > It's up to you. I thought it was weird that all the other optional arguments were not labeled as "optional" and only this one. That's not what I see: grepping the ELisp manual for "optional argument" comes up with more than 200 hits. It's quite normal to use that.