From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35548: image.c uses deprecated rsvg_handle_write etc. Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 15:53:49 +0300 Message-ID: <83h882arky.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="268311"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35548@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 04 14:55:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hj1Gd-0017eb-0R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 14:55:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45432 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hj1Gb-0005Du-VG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:55:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hj1GS-00058o-Vh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:55:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hj1GS-0007a1-0d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hj1GQ-0007XA-DA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hj1GQ-0000q1-8c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35548 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35548-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35548.15622448493157 (code B ref 35548); Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35548) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jul 2019 12:54:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hj1FZ-0000or-E7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:54:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59825) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hj1FX-0000oV-5B for 35548@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hj1FQ-000710-EP; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1163 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hj1FP-0005vS-OD; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:54:00 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu on Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:14:08 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:162049 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:14:08 +0900 > From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu > Cc: 35548@debbugs.gnu.org > > If we omit Windows DLL stuff, then the patch would be as simple as > below. But Eli may dislike this (even with DLL support) for the very > reasons he dislikes the patch for Bug#36315 the other participants > prefer: When we must move to other APIs because the libraries stop supporting the ones we use, my liking or disliking that is hardly relevant. It would be unreasonable for me to put my preferences before development needs, would it not?