From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37562: 26.2; Obsolete vt-control and vt100-led Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:27:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83h84tbpxl.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="115023"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37562@debbugs.gnu.org To: Nicolas Semrau Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 30 20:28:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iF0P3-000TmP-TR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:28:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55988 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iF0P1-0002EP-VH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iF0Ow-0002ED-Se for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iF0Ov-0007ip-Vs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iF0Ov-0007iN-R9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iF0Ov-0002Ds-KU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:28:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37562.15698680348478 (code B ref 37562); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2019 18:27:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60491 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iF0O8-0002Cc-5M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49620) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iF0O6-0002CP-Cu for 37562@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iF0O1-0005cU-8D; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1355 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iF0O0-0005r6-0f; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:04 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Nicolas Semrau on Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:49:56 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167938 Archived-At: > From: Nicolas Semrau > Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:49:56 +0200 > > Five years ago, Stefan Monnier asked if vt100-led.el and vt-control.el > could be obsoleted.[1] Since there was no objection at the time (and > the hardware certainly not gaining in popularity since then), I propose > to go through with declaring /lisp/vt-control.el and /lisp/vt100-led.el > obsolete. Aren't they useful with lisp/term/vtXXX.el, which we didn't yet obsolete?