From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40733: 28.0.50; Emacs locks up on paste (yank) of unicode characters Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:29:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7xcgbet.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mu756aen.fsf@tcd.ie> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="38656"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, rpluim@gmail.com, 40733@debbugs.gnu.org To: Will Bush Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 21 16:30:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtuj-0009w8-Pm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:30:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59128 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtuh-0003Ux-Ro for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:30:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33820) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtuZ-0003TN-Er for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtuV-0006Pc-J3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtuV-0006Nl-6s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtuU-0003R2-Ow for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40733 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40733-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40733.158747939213165 (code B ref 40733); Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2020 14:29:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50492 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtuJ-0003QF-WD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58894) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtuB-0003Pv-Dt for 40733@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:29:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtu5-00063I-RG; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:29:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2598 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtu2-0001FP-DY; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:29:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Will Bush on Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:19:56 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:178754 Archived-At: > From: Will Bush > Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:19:56 -0500 > Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 40733@debbugs.gnu.org > > I tried Emacs 26.3 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.17) (A > version that just happens to be in nixpkgs) again to see what it would do when > yanking that character with and without google-fonts installed. > > With google-fonts installed it doesn't have latency issues, but it inserts an > empty whitespace looking character (wider than a normal space). Without > google-fonts installed, it renders the character fine with no latency. > > So I suspect even if there is an issue with google-fonts, there's still a > regression in Emacs since 26.3. I'm not sure I understand: you are saying that slow, but correct display is _worse_ than displaying a white space instead of the correct glyph, i.e. producing incorrect display? To me, it sounds like Emacs 27+ actually _improves_ things in this case.