From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40990: Improve message-mode and isearch icons Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 18:53:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7wmbh8i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ees4w562.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv0zvey3.fsf@gnu.org> <45991686-81b4-a27d-6367-f01bbc20ab10@yandex.ru> <838siavor9.fsf@gnu.org> <3e8277b7-c3dd-56e9-4b40-b817aae264d4@yandex.ru> <835zd3ci7d.fsf@gnu.org> <60322abc-7b56-db02-3a41-2bfc9ea59b9c@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="30002"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 40990-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 11 17:54:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYAkw-0007hF-Sl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:54:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48152 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYAkv-0001n2-TF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:54:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYAkk-0001le-PY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYAkk-0003eg-Fl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYAkk-0007gy-CC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40990 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40990-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D40990.158921242729529 (code D ref 40990); Mon, 11 May 2020 15:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40990-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2020 15:53:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53000 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYAkV-0007gC-D7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:53:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42642) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYAkT-0007fu-EY for 40990-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:53:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYAkL-0003ct-Sb; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:53:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3466 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jYAkL-0003ud-9G; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:53:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <60322abc-7b56-db02-3a41-2bfc9ea59b9c@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 11 May 2020 17:18:15 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180068 Archived-At: > Cc: 40990-done@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 17:18:15 +0300 > > For example, if we target, say, a new Emacs release every 6 months, then > it will be 2 months development, 2 months stabilization, and 2 months > prerelease (with new developments doing to the master for the last 4 > months). 2 months for development is way too little. > With cycles like that, there will also be less temptation to "sneak that > last feature in", or land an experimental feature later in the cycle. > Developers will also moderate the risk themselves. I will believe that when I see it ;-) Anyway, serious discussion of this should be on emacs-devel.