From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41890: 28.0.50; [PATCH]: Add bindings for project.el Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:16:37 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7vb0w3u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87blljbarq.fsf@thornhill.no> <83pn9z13xq.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfknklj8.fsf@thornhill.no> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="47750"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41890@debbugs.gnu.org To: Theodor Thornhill Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 16 19:23:00 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jlFIZ-000CIQ-Oj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:22:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33712 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlFIY-0004ai-PO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:22:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlFDm-0005i1-2O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlFDl-0000n5-PI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:18:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlFDl-0006Sy-Kh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41890 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 41890-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41890.159232782224787 (code B ref 41890); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41890) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2020 17:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49527 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlFCo-0006Rj-Az for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlFCm-0006RC-Ng for 41890@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60600) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlFCg-0000gz-W7; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2720 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jlFCg-0008Qz-Bl; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:16:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lfknklj8.fsf@thornhill.no> (message from Theodor Thornhill on Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:44:51 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182030 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:44:51 +0000 > From: Theodor Thornhill > Cc: 41890@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Can you tell what is the rationale for having project.el keymap > > defined outside of project.el? > > In https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41879#23 > Dmitry says: > > "Do we keep it in project.el or somewhere outside? Maybe the latter, since > project.el is also an ELPA package, and we generally don't want packages to > alter Emacs' key bindings right after installation." > > I guess this concern is for when users not building from master is downloading 'project.el' from ELPA. > > I don't really have a strong opinion for any direction. Would you rather want them in 'project.el'? I certainly would. It is very unusual for an optional package to have its bindings in files that are preloaded into every Emacs session. > > If nothing happens within a week or two, ping them and CC me. > > He responded and said they have what they need from me and will process it further. I guess it is done at some point soon. Well, if there's no progress within a week or two, my suggestion still stands. Thanks.