From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24542: 25.1.50; The symbol `@' and sexp scanning Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 16:31:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7sdu0qf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8760pj27wm.fsf@web.de> <87o9zptn3r.fsf@web.de> <87zij95hbr.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87pok48g65.fsf@web.de> <874kodbskf.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4057"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 24542@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 04 15:33:49 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kEBqe-0000vn-M8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 15:33:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53954 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEBqd-0005Ph-ND for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:33:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEBpu-0004Py-6o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEBpt-0004i2-TM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:33:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEBpt-0005gN-Qg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 13:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24542 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 24542-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24542.159922633120151 (code B ref 24542); Fri, 04 Sep 2020 13:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2020 13:32:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38027 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEBp4-0005Ej-RQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:32:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEBp3-00059x-CI for 24542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:32:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEBox-0004dA-9u; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2982 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kEBow-0000a4-AM; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:32:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874kodbskf.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 04 Sep 2020 15:05:36 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187135 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 15:05:36 +0200 > Cc: 24542@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net > > I tried the patch, and it fixes the > > (setq a '@) > > problem for me. I don't really have a great overview of where > scan_lists is used for -- it seems like a very general solution to a > very specific problem. > > Does anybody have any comments here? Stefan, any comments?