From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45072: 28.0.50; Emacs switches other buffer back uncontrollably, if other window's buffer is changed by user during minibuffer editing Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:51:37 +0200 Message-ID: <83h7ow70ty.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86eek3hvu5.fsf@protected.rcdrun.com> <87eek1fvgf.fsf@gnus.org> <83eek18ref.fsf@gnu.org> <835z5d8lhc.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfe8jsok.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39876"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: bugs@gnu.support, 45072@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 08 16:53:35 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmfJ1-000AG7-N6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:53:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54834 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmfJ0-0003jg-Py for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:53:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54048) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmfHW-00030F-Vt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47729) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmfHW-0004Jv-BZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmfHW-0005Fq-AE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45072 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45072-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45072.160744271320182 (code B ref 45072); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2020 15:51:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59275 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmfHN-0005FS-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:51:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60852) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmfHK-0005FF-Ph for 45072@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:51:51 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmfHF-0004Ge-3f; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:51:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2827 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kmfHD-0003ja-Bz; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:51:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87lfe8jsok.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:09:15 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195372 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Jean Louis , > 45072@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:09:15 +0100 > > Looks good to me, but I'd revert the logic, as "negative" variables have > a tendency to be misunderstood. That is, call the variable > `read-from-minibuffer-restore' and default it to t instead. Yes. But maybe read-from-minibuffer-restore-windows would be even better.