From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46502: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] (d3a399dd) native-comp bootstrap failure Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:34:01 +0200 Message-ID: <83h7m95tt2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o8gn8ciy.fsf@md5i.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5991"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mwd@md5i.com, 46502@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 15:34:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkNh-0001Rq-R0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:34:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48548 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkNg-000690-K2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkNW-00068e-NZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkNW-0006bc-GD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkNW-00087n-EA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46502 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46502-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46502.161365883731219 (code B ref 46502); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46502) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2021 14:33:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46480 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkNQ-00087T-KR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:33:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40702) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkNO-00087E-Hp for 46502@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:33:54 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkNI-0006Xe-RW; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:33:48 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4802 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkNI-0000MN-2P; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:33:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:14:24 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200256 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:14:24 +0000 > Cc: Michael Welsh Duggan , 46502@debbugs.gnu.org > > One thing I've noticed in my experiments is that many builds that are > interrupted at the wrong point and then resumed produce different > results. I.e. you type "make", then hit Ctrl-C at the wrong time, then > type "make" again and you get a different result. What does "different result" mean in this case? is the produced .eln file different? or something else? > BTW, I'm also seeing very deep recursion when building the nativecomp > branch How do you see that? And what code recurses so deeply?