unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Ben Levy <blevy@protonmail.com>
Cc: 22763@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#22763: 25.1.50; Feature Request -- A faster method to obtain line number at position.
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 23:09:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83h7ixnp49.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1TyanmjF6SBvziMpm9jWhwA0kDQ9iG5jzO7S0dTBDQjNe1sc7te_PrVSR1_pGXPFgQzlDEX2Nq5NK-wJiHQyCDhemaevOVf527K_I1jGvIw=@protonmail.com> (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org)

> Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 19:53:24 +0000
> From:  Ben Levy via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
> 
> I'm not 100% sure about this, but it looks like when
> line-number-at-pos was written in elisp, it didn't do
> any bounds check, and instead called (widen) before
> counting lines.  Did the elisp version have unintended
> behavior, or are the differences with the C version
> a regression?

I cannot answer that, because I don't understand what regression are
you talking about.

There's no need to widen the buffer in order to scan buffer text in C,
AFAIK.

> I think it's causing this bug:
> https://github.com/io12/good-scroll.el/issues/16

Please explain the connection.  I've read that discussion, but didn't
see any data that would indicate this function is the culprit.  At the
very least, please tell which arguments are passed to
line-number-at-pos in the problematic case, and what is the narrowed
region.





  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-22  2:42 bug#22763: 25.1.50; Feature Request -- A faster method to obtain line number at position Keith David Bershatsky
2016-02-22 16:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-07 15:07   ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 15:44     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 16:07     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 17:40       ` Stefan Monnier
2021-02-07 17:45         ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 18:07           ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 18:09           ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-07 18:14             ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 18:23               ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 19:02                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-07 19:06                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-07 19:25                   ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 19:34                     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 19:43                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-07 19:42                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-07 19:46                       ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 19:52                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-07 21:52                           ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 21:58                             ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-08  3:34                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-07 22:09                             ` Philipp
2021-02-07 20:37                     ` Stefan Monnier
2021-02-07 20:42                       ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-07 20:50                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-07 21:36                           ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-08 15:04                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-09  2:17                               ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2021-02-09  7:13                                 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-19 23:55 ` Ben Levy via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-05-20  6:45   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-20  7:27     ` Andreas Schwab
2021-05-20  7:35       ` Ben Levy via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-05-20  9:08         ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-20  9:03       ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-20 19:53 ` Ben Levy via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-05-20 20:09   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2021-05-20 20:40 ` Ben Levy via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-05-21  5:46   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83h7ixnp49.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=22763@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=blevy@protonmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).