From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49869: Revert buffer? Yes/No/Maybe Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 15:53:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7g5l6al.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87im0la99d.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pmutl8iv.fsf@gnu.org> <83im0ll7oi.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3705"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, 49869@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 04 14:56:46 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBGRw-0000gy-N8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:56:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41530 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBGRu-0006or-Dc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:56:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBGQI-0005Ad-Cr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59769) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBGQI-0001Lc-3w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBGQH-0003tl-UR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49869 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49869-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49869.162808165014908 (code B ref 49869); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49869) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 12:54:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43082 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBGPR-0003sO-PC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:54:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60522) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBGPP-0003s8-PB for 49869@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBGPJ-0000zV-PT; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:54:01 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4223 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBGPI-0005Ca-Fv; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:54:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Gregory Heytings on Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:37:43 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:211174 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:37:43 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: juri@linkov.net, 49869@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> (global-set-key (kbd "C-x x g") 'revert-buffer-short-answer) > > > > If you propose this as something people who want this could do in their > > init files, then I agree. > > > > No, I propose this as a solution to Juri's problem, instead of his > proposed solution to "revert the buffer immediately" with C-x x g, which > is indeed too drastic. Something even better to take Lars' suggestion (do > not ask confirmation when the buffer has not been modified) into account: I don't think we need to cater to personal preferences by adding new commands. The user option exists so that users could customize the behavior to their liking without requiring us to provide a solution for every personal taste.