From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56691: outline-minor-mode displays navigation arrow buttons as emojis Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 14:18:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83h72u28si.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k0842s4s.fsf@gnus.org> <83o7xgi53z.fsf@gnu.org> <87zggyyiy3.fsf@gnus.org> <874jz1wgzm.fsf@gnus.org> <83sfml8gez.fsf@gnu.org> <87czdom9w6.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnbw6r9o.fsf@gnu.org> <877d3u25t3.fsf@gnus.org> <87fsiik7ur.fsf@yahoo.com> <87fsiiwuqj.fsf@gnus.org> <87wnbuhzoi.fsf@yahoo.com> <87fsihk30q.fsf@gmail.com> <87les9h5f0.fsf@yahoo.com> <871qu02qu2.fsf@gnus.org> <871qu0gs7k.fsf@yahoo.com> <83y1w82nvv.fsf@gnu.org> <87h72w18t3.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmhk2ma5.fsf@gnu.org> <878ro816p2.fsf@gnus.org> <83ilnc2jm0.fsf@gnu.org> <877d3r2cod.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6362"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, rpluim@gmail.com, 56691@debbugs.gnu.org, hello@paulwrankin.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 02 13:19:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oIpvo-0001Uc-2H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 13:19:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46058 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIpvl-0007KH-Vl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 07:19:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIpvS-0006tR-Qd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 07:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIpvS-0003xn-CP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 07:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oIpvS-0004Za-2Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 07:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 11:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56691 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 56691-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56691.165943911917547 (code B ref 56691); Tue, 02 Aug 2022 11:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56691) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2022 11:18:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oIpv4-0004Yw-I6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 07:18:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42226) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oIpv2-0004Yk-HP for 56691@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 07:18:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIpux-0003sv-7U; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 07:18:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=jtLa/imVpawdELFc34tmj4CNCRVz1k1w5r5uEtcAHZw=; b=CML/U41f+WZ6 fC+vgtM3yo2o5ohlibcYaDplGVe2pglpWRQiqu1xjYFTCakIgKN3fRrldwNjGGROx95IV+RJZp/HI DOigZCsN0GwRXaoWY/NS9Dxnmc5jMnY1ZCpzJBkhd1kPmi/nXEEhWsD0AmS2WricKlKW0rFE8zK3B MzZnGj0odjwiawiu+kepvVnEWy7U4/uYxDCD26c0JAkpXtsNSAX3PdKeFhoHlYKHoysZ/hLrdmdNP +rqZxUGCmV2jtNFcfLC8+7zd1RXX00D01xOxtmwEf9cUuGwk5cRG+BHAE687+Vz/DPjcnYjr7IMoz hz5Yriaz2gYQPw22Ikr++g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4047 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIpuw-00011b-MU; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 07:18:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877d3r2cod.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 02 Aug 2022 11:54:26 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:238527 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, rpluim@gmail.com, 56691@debbugs.gnu.org, > hello@paulwrankin.com > Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 11:54:26 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Faced with these complications, I thought we decided just to test for > > the _potential_ of displaying color Emoji, and leave it to the user to > > set their systems so that the potential is realized, or customize > > Emacs to disable color Emoji. That sounds much easier, more reliable, > > and on top of that can be extended to TTY frames that are capable of > > displaying color Emoji, whereas what you propose isn't. > > I'm proposing that we should have a primitive that makes it possible to > have the defaults work for most people. How would what I proposed miss that goal?