From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade' Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:28:56 +0300 Message-ID: <83h6tl6xgn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2726a957-a2a8-3b89-8930-2d620d83491e@alphapapa.net> <83sfd7c1v1.fsf@gnu.org> <875ya3euof.fsf@posteo.net> <87fs95a6y3.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30413"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: adam@alphapapa.net, dmitry@gutov.dev, philipk@posteo.net, larsi@gnus.org, 62750@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 15:29:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaXE-0007Zt-Je for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:29:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaX2-00073a-4l; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaX0-00073O-Mq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaX0-0002bE-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaWz-0000gK-Sa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62750 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62750-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62750.16813061042572 (code B ref 62750); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62750) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2023 13:28:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39354 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaWO-0000fQ-8V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:28:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaWM-0000fA-4Q for 62750@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaWF-0002W5-Sm; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:28:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ReNfHDkq0TSZOKy6lPoUFf4KjYGElB7GAGo8APQkitw=; b=TeGPl/hHZR2+ Gg2y/7T4wLBYO96QXHM+9wCTUl6sifO27ocZyT0SodP+pGzvVfAy1sKWaShR4wVWqxxJCvh7/vsNi YJNtYZXs+23uEumKJcuneH5iQrxymEQ1NvidEQRpPKQmKJUL2Kix3zeMgNgoIf0T13Y0KC+y9TzxR JMlCfGmvm6+0d/7nbcI6YNzS+SPsdo+IIffE8AfYw9j7L9PEmW9b15+cqbBhlZY1BiYw+Nu9eJIAI il5856HDXy1W5brpzOd1X886g4xOE4ZwRAfdFQZAYw2e/pNvIuh2Vr9ZaCJ1IIn4SJzrXdHDDWlC/ lm1F2tmPKKFWJjm2Flb7GA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmaWC-0005Kc-1D; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:28:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:22:03 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259738 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Dmitry Gutov , Adam Porter , Eli > Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen , > 62750@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:22:03 -0400 > > >> It's annoyingly late to rename, but if we rename without compatibility > >> aliases (which seems to be an option since these are new in Emacs-29), > >> then I'd be in favor. > > > > What are compatibility aliases? I must have missed something? > > I thought we'd rename `package-update` to `package-upgrade` by adding > the new name and marking the old name as an obsolete alias (a > "compatibility alias"). > > I hadn't realized that `package-update` hasn't been in a release yet, so > we don't need such a compatibility alias. Even though these commands were available under those names for the last year or so?