bug#68375: 29.1; lispref documentation fixes

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
> Cc: eliz@gnu.org,  manphiz@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:32:10 +0100
> 
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:21:08 +0100 Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:44:35 +0100 Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:46:34 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> From: Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com>
> >>>> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:56:23 -0800
> >>>> 
> >>>> Please find the attached patches for a cumulation of documentation fixes
> >>>> for lispref up to chapter 19 that includes typos, formatting, etc.
> >>>> Please let me know if any changes need improvements and I'll adjust
> >>>> accordingly.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.  See below.
> >> [...]
> >>>>    A string is a fixed sequence of characters.  It is a type of
> >>>> -sequence called a @dfn{array}, meaning that its length is fixed and
> >>>> +sequence called an @dfn{array}, meaning that its length is fixed and
> >>>
> >>> The "an" here is correct, since in a manual one sees "an array", which
> >>> is correct English.  So I didn't install this part.
> >>
> >> You misread the patch, it changes "a" to "an", which makes the text
> >> correct English.  I thought I'd save you some work by installing the
> >> patch myself, which I just did, but unfortunately to master instead of
> >> emacs-29 (and also forgot to add the bug number).  Should I revert it
> >> and install to the release branch?  Sorry for the trouble.
> >
> > I went ahead and reverted the change on master and installed it on
> > emacs-29 (with bug number).
> 
> ... but without the "Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes" cookie 😕.  Should
> I revert again?  (This time I will not act without explicit permission.)

It's too late, since reverting a change doesn't remove it from Git
history.

I hope Xiyue Deng will assign the copyright, which will then cover
this blunder.

Thanks.