From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9528: 24.0.50; Info navigation Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:03:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83fwjstt7f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mxe1li9l.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316448323 10029 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2011 16:05:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9528@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 19 18:05:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5gLO-0000km-Mf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:05:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47942 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5gLI-0004BT-KV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:05:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5gLB-0003z2-Ui for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5gL7-0003oG-8T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5gL7-0003ns-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5gPy-0002oO-LY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9528 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9528-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9528.131644859710794 (code B ref 9528); Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9528) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2011 16:09:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5gPs-0002o2-UG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:09:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5gPq-0002nu-6I for 9528@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:09:55 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LRS00L001Z77Z00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9528@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:04:50 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.239.98]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LRS00K2U2010BK0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:04:50 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:10:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51481 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Dani Moncayo , 9528@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:24:12 -0400 > > FWIW, I'm with Dani on this one: maybe jumping back to the intermediate > "Functions" node makes sense for deep reasons, but there are good > superficial reasons to ignore this internal node for `l'. Then we will have to disagree. But I beg you to please leave the traditional operation of `l' alone. If we want to cater to users who are confused by that, let's have a separate command. We can bind it to something users nowadays expect, like M-, and also to the "go back in history" button on the tool bar. Just let's not change what `l' does, as long as the stand-alone reader works like that.