From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9767: 24.0.90; gdb initialization on Cygwin Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:02:17 +0200 Message-ID: <83fwiotzbq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4E9B0033.2070506@cornell.edu> <4E9B63F0.5040409@cornell.edu> <4E9F2C49.4060307@cornell.edu> <83ipnku3rb.fsf@gnu.org> <4E9F365A.9060207@cornell.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319061822 4659 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2011 22:03:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9767@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 20 00:03:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGeEb-00083K-E6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:03:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53405 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGeEa-0001a5-TA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:03:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35437) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGeEE-0001U7-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGeDz-0003dJ-Rw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:03:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGeDy-0003cf-EQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:02:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGeF0-0005QF-Sm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9767 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9767-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9767.131906182820818 (code B ref 9767); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9767) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2011 22:03:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGeEl-0005Pj-TP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGeEi-0005PU-ST for 9767@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LTC00I002FSDN00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 9767@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:02:18 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.212.197]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LTC00IDB2JRDH10@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:02:18 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:04:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52881 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 9767@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:03:23 +0200 > > Ken Brown writes: > > > No, wait_reading_process_output treats EINTR as though it meant there's no > > input available. > > Which is correct because an interrupted select does not report anything. > And then the loop will be restarted to call select again. Yes, that's what I thought should be happening. Sorry if that was unclear. So the question is still why no input is being reported, although wait_reading_process_output should loop and call `select' again.