From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11094: Wrong cursor positioning with display+invisible Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:02:24 +0300 Message-ID: <83fwcd8h9r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83vclljesi.fsf@gnu.org> <83wr5yj0yl.fsf@gnu.org> <83vclihyal.fsf@gnu.org> <83vclhdes4.fsf@gnu.org> <83pqbjagop.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333958719 25191 80.91.229.3 (9 Apr 2012 08:05:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11094@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 09 10:05:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SH9b7-0006zG-AF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 10:05:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56781 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SH9b6-0004z4-AY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 04:05:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44993) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SH9b3-0004wG-Fa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 04:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SH9b1-0000RO-Pn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 04:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SH9b1-0000Qz-MU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 04:05:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SH9bt-00076m-I3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 04:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11094-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11094.133395876027317 (code B ref 11094); Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Apr 2012 08:06:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46141 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SH9bs-00076X-6b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 04:06:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:49220) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SH9bq-00076P-BH for 11094@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 04:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M2700L00D2J3V00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 11094@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:04:20 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.57.204]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M2700LH4D373310@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:04:20 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58622 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: 11094@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:23:17 -0400 > > > The patch below solves this problem. Do you think it is safe enough > > for the release branch? > > Let's keep it on the trunk for now. Done as trunk revision 107809. Should I close this bug, or is there anything else?