From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4789: use bootstrap-emacs to build emacs/leim directory, load emacs/leim/leim-list.el to loadup.el Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:32:32 +0300 Message-ID: <83fwcc6qrj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <200911061649.nA6GnhUq027369@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <55y6026rpt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <79pql88pwu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <7iobr1s76d.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83iph98hv8.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehrx8fxp.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcl87rxc.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334039718 10350 80.91.229.3 (10 Apr 2012 06:35:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 4789@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 10 08:35:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHUfd-00016f-Au for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:35:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37799 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHUfc-00089P-Ko for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:35:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHUfU-000871-Do for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:35:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHUfP-0008C9-KB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHUfP-0008Bz-HD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHUgM-0003Cv-I0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4789 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 4789-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4789.133403973112292 (code B ref 4789); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2012 06:35:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47962 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHUfp-0003C9-Mm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:35:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:39538) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHUfm-0003C1-Pg for 4789@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:35:27 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M29001003KBD600@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 4789@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:34:25 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.57.204]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M29001413LC9VH0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:34:25 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58678 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Glenn Morris , 4789@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:52:59 -0400 > > > compile all the *.el files under leim/ as well, but Stefan once told > > me something that I interpreted to mean he would rather go in the > > opposite direction -- let the build process compile all the *.el files > > under lisp/ and ship them uncompiled in the tarball. > > Maybe I misunderstood. > > What I said/meant was that we should reduce the difference between > "build from tarball" and "build from Bzr checkout". So, yes, I'd rather > we don't distribute the .elc files in the tarball. But it's a low > priority goal. Does it mean you will be against distributing Leim packages in byte-compiled form?