From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13219: 24.3.50; missing `...' in Emacs manual Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:22:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83fw2zn4if.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k3sbhloq.fsf@gnu.org> <4D17A9193B6E4B82A8F138631D887384@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356081838 28279 80.91.229.3 (21 Dec 2012 09:23:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13219@debbugs.gnu.org, cyd@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 21 10:24:13 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlypu-0005wv-0W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:24:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39874 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlypg-0004zP-4M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:23:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlypb-0004z8-VL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:23:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlypa-0000oM-6o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:23:51 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlypa-0000oH-3f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:23:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlypm-0006Mh-AP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13219 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 13219-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13219.135608179724418 (code B ref 13219); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13219) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2012 09:23:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53497 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlyp2-0006Lm-Km for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:23:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:33607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlyp0-0006Lc-Sv for 13219@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:23:15 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MFD00700JDB2K00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 13219@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:23:01 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MFD006GLJEDYE30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:23:01 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4D17A9193B6E4B82A8F138631D887384@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68839 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:24:21 -0800 > Cc: 13219@debbugs.gnu.org > > > It is the convention in the manual not to insert `..' around single > > function keys which are already printed like . Not a > > bug (and no bike-shedding please). > > See attached screenshot. Are you perhaps trying to make a virtue (and a > convention) out of mistake? Do you honestly think it is more readable to have > these exceptions? Are you referring to the highlight? If so, who or what did the highlighting of `..' strings in that screenshot? I don't see such highlighting in "emacs -Q". We had this argument before. is a name of a single key. We don't quote single keys named by their labels, only key sequences.