From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13553: 24.3.50; incorrect usage of IS_DIRECTORY_SEP Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:06:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83fw1ojax4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83libgje5t.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359209277 1947 80.91.229.3 (26 Jan 2013 14:07:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13553@debbugs.gnu.org To: shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 26 15:08:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tz6QZ-0007r9-W6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:08:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60663 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tz6QI-0005HY-CB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:07:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tz6Q9-0005H5-SW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:07:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tz6Q8-0005Rk-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:07:49 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tz6Q8-0005Rd-Ov for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:07:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tz6QM-0002Gi-Ci for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13553 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13553-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13553.13592092278661 (code B ref 13553); Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13553) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2013 14:07:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50208 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tz6PR-0002Fc-GQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:07:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:59841) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tz6PP-0002FB-9d for 13553@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MH800300KI7OO00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 13553@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:06:38 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MH8003OWKJ15NB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:06:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <83libgje5t.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70343 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:56:46 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 13553@debbugs.gnu.org > > After looking at the code which I fixed, I'm afraid I don't understand > why file-attributes returned nil in your case. The code that uses > IS_DIRECTORY_SEP there is only a fallback, for when the > GetFileInformationByHandle API fails for some reason. You don't say > what version of Windows you are using, but I won't expect that > fallback code be executed for any reasonably recent Windows version. Actually, that fallback code gets also executed if you customize w32-get-true-file-attributes to nil, or if the file is on a remote (i.e. networked) filesystem. Could one of these be true in your case?