From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15825: unidata-gen seems messed up somehow Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:43:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83fvr75lmx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mwlg5gf5.fsf@gnu.org> <83iow35o5v.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383900256 24845 80.91.229.3 (8 Nov 2013 08:44:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 08:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 15825@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris , Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 08 09:44:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vehfs-0002GH-MC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:44:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vehfs-0007JF-6L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 03:44:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49751) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vehfj-0007Iy-RU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 03:44:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vehfe-00047k-Nf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 03:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54997) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vehfe-00047f-K4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 03:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vehfe-0001uT-1A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 03:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 08:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15825 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15825-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15825.13839002387323 (code B ref 15825); Fri, 08 Nov 2013 08:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15825) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2013 08:43:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40783 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vehfa-0001u3-G8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 03:43:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:52573) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VehfX-0001tn-6X for 15825@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 03:43:56 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MVX00J00S5HEO00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 15825@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:43:48 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MVX00JPOS907K70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:43:48 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80131 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: 15825@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu > Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 03:10:58 -0500 > > Although make -C admin/unidata now produces a buildable state, it still > modifies some of the uni-*.el files in non-obvious ways. The differences are always by 1, i.e. some byte is 94 instead of 93. > Are these differences ok? Not sure, perhaps Handa-san could comment. If you bisect for those differences, does bisect also blame the same commit?