From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:12:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83fvhpkgbh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874myjnjek.fsf@tanger.home> <83bnsi4kw8.fsf@gnu.org> <87ha2a8cet.fsf@tanger.home> <83a9823vhr.fsf@gnu.org> <874mya80u2.fsf@tanger.home> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406276003 19776 80.91.229.3 (25 Jul 2014 08:13:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18023@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daimrod Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 25 10:13:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XAact-0008VK-Ut for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:13:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53526 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAact-0002BG-Dj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:13:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56619) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAacl-00029r-G7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAacg-00075I-9S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAacg-000756-5N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XAacf-0006iP-Nj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:13:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18023 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18023-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18023.140627594025756 (code B ref 18023); Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18023) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2014 08:12:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37347 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XAac0-0006hL-3N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:12:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:60310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XAabx-0006h7-DY for 18023@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:12:18 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N9900H00DACM000@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 18023@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:12:18 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N9900FQ7DGHBC20@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:12:18 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <874mya80u2.fsf@tanger.home> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91778 Archived-At: > From: Daimrod > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 18023@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:38:29 +0900 > > >> > FWIW, it strikes me that "C-q _" is less typing. > >> > >> It's not consistent and it doesn't really save typing: > >> - "SPC _ _" > >> - "SPC C-q _" > > > > I meant "SPC SPC DEL _". As for "SPC _ _", it's of the same length, > > so it doesn't save typing, either. > > It wasn't clear in my initial message so it's my fault. In my patch, I > update the latin-postfix input-method so that one can type "SPC _ _" > instead of "SPC SPC DEL _". > > Though I agree that it doesn't save typing compared to the method you > proposed, my approach saves typing compared to the current method and I > find my method faster to type because it's consistent with the other > combinations and it doesn't "break the flow". I don't necessarily object to the change, I just wanted to point out that alternatives better than "SPC SPC DEL _" do exist.